(Sace me bhikkhu samma vihareyyum asunno loko arahantehi assa).
One finds it hard to believe. But if one
examines it, one must believe it.
In the simple statement: "monks will practise right
living, the world will not be empty of Arahants" the expression
"right living" has an important and profound meaning. Right
living implies absence of the idea of "I", "mine". We are living
day after day, but we are not living rightly, so the idea of
"I" and "mine" is born. It pops up numerous times every
day, so there is no chance for full Nirvana to come in and
we don't become Arahants. Right living means living in
accordance with the Noble Eightfold Path: right understanding,
right thoughts, right speech, action, livelihood,
effort, mindfulness, and right concentration. If we have
these eight kinds of perfection, we are practising right living.
And if we live rightly in this way, the mental defilements
cannot arise, "I" and "mine" cannot be born; they wither
away, like an animal deprived of nourishment. Right living
deprives the "I" and the "mine" of nourishment, and so
prevents them from taking birth. In time they lose their
strength and the day finally comes when they dry up
completely and disappear for good and that is what is
called attaining the Fruit of the Path, total Nirvana.
The important thing is continuous right understanding
and right action, so that the "I" and the "mine"
cannot arise, so that there is no birth. When there is no
birth of any kind, there is no suffering of any kind, and that
is true happiness, as the Buddha said. Once one has
examined this matter and come to realize that birth is always
suffering, every time, one takes good care to avoid birth.
It is easy to understand that the birth referred to is something
mental, Something in the mind, but it is very difficult to master
this birth. In a single day or even in a single hour one may
experience this kind of birth many times, many dozens of
times. Be careful about this problem of birth; it is a problem
that faces us here and now. If we can master this kind of
birth here and now we will also be able to master the birth
that comes after physical death. So let's not concern
ourselves with the birth that folflows physical death;
instead let us concern ourselves seriously with the birth that
happens before physical death, the kind of birth that goes
on while we are alive, which happens dozens of times every
day; let us learn to master it and the problem will be
eliminated. If birth can be eliminated here and now, in this
life, that will be the end of birth for good and all.
Everyone concerns himself with the trivial question
in what form he will be reborn after death, wondering into
which of the eight realms of existence he will be reborn.
as a hell-being, an animal, a preta (hungry ghost), an
asura (frightened ghost), a human being, a god of the
sensuous heaven (kamavacara), an embodied brahma, or
a bodiless brahma. Each of these possible forms of rebirth
falls under either of the two headings Sugati and Duggati,
depending on the nature of the corresponding feelings.
Those states that are desirable or satisfying are called
Sugati; those that are the opposite are callend Duggati. But
this is not the doctrine the Buddha taught. He taught: if there
is birth there is nothing but perpetual suffering; and this is
so regardless of the realm into which one is born, because
"birth refers to grasping and clinging, as already discussed.
No matter what one is born as, it is suffering. The form
of the suffering may vary, as in the case the millionaire
and the beggar, but it is suffering nevertheless, suffering
as heavy as that of the Duggati realms. And while birth
in the Duggati realms brings the sufferings of the Duggati
realms, birth in the Sugati realms brings the sufferings of
the Sugati realms. Birth has to be stopped altogether. Don't
go wondeiring what you will be reborn as: don't go thinking
of being reborn as a human being, or a god, or a brahma.
The result will be the suffering of a human being, a god,
or a brahma, because even the brahmas experience
suffering, the suffering of brahmas. If brahmas were free
from suffering there would have been no need for Buddhism
Buddhism came into existence in order to produce Ariyans,
people who have put an end to suffering of every kind,
the suffering of human beings, of gods, and of brahmas,
This is why the Buddha is referred to as the "Teacher of
gods and men": he taught to put an end to suffering for all
beings.
Here caution is needed. A person here in this
particular life has the possibilty of being reborn into any
realm of existence in the vast cycle of Samsara: into one
of the lower worlds or Duggati as a hell-being, animal, preta,
or asura; into the middle realm as a human being; or into
one of the higher realms as a god of the sensuous sphere,
as an embodied brahma, or (at the highest level) as a
bodiless brahma. So there are eight possibilities: the four
woeful states or lower realms, the human world or middle
realm, and three heavens or upper realms. Each of these
eight forms of birth is suffering in its own particular way.
If one identifies with one's state of birth, one is bound to
experience the corresponding kind of suffering-and every
one of us has, in his everyday life, experienced these eight
kinds of birth. let us try to understand what this means.
We shall deal first with birth in the woeful states, birth as
a hell-being, animal, preta (hungry ghost), or asura
(frightened ghost).
The real meaning of "hell" is anxiety
(literally "mind-heat"). Anxiety burns one like a fire. If a
person is worked up, burning with anxiety, then he is to
be recognized as a hell-being. Whether monk, novice, lay
follower, householder, or whatever, if he is burning with
anxiety ("mind-heat"), burning through involvement in "I" ,
"mine", then he is in hell.
If at some moment a person is deluded, then at that
moment he is a dumb animal. At any time that a person,
male or female, monk or layman, or whatever, is deluded,
he has taken birth as an animal. The meaning of birth as
an animal is delusion.
At any time that "I" and "mine" go the way of mental
hunger and thirst, as when a gambler or a person buying
lottery tickets suffers a hunger for money, a hunger to win
a prize, a mental hunger, that is birth as a preta (hungry
ghost). Birth as a preta is extreme mental hunger.
If there is fear, timidity, that is birth as an asura
(frightened ghost). The word "a-sura" means "not brave", an
asura is any timid, frightened person.
In a single day we may be born in all four of these
states. Watch! Notice in what form the "I" and "mine" arise,
If they arise in the form of anxiety, one has been born a
denizen of hell; if as delusion, an animal; if as mental hunger,
a preta; and it they arise in the form of fear, one has been
born an asura. Here is an example to illustrate.
A gambler who makes a blunder and loses
everything experiences anxiety, as if burnt by fire; he has
fallen into hell right there in the gambling-house. Again,
when he is so deluded as to think that gambling can solve
his problems, he is a dumb animal-even before he begins
playing. When, in the course of playing, he has an
uncontrollable mental hunger, then he is a preta. And when
he is afraid of being beaten and losing everything, then he
is an asura. This single example, the case of a gambler
in a gaming-house, shows how one may be born as a hell-being,
an animal, preta, or an asura.
Our grandparents were no fools, otherwise they
would not have had the saying: "Heaven is in the heart;
hell is in the mind." Their children and grandchildren
apparently are fools because they think one goes to
heaven or hell only after dying, after having been put into
the coffin. Examine this idea and you will see how foolish
it is. So let us be as intelligent as our grandparents, at
least to the extent of recognizing that heaven and hell are
in the mind.
Think of the example of the gambler, who can
become a hell-being, an animal, a preta, or an asura.
Anxiety can come from wrong-doing or as a result of karma.
Anxiety is hell. Delusion can sometimes be so bad as to
be almost beyond belief. Have a good think about it;
examine it and you will see that we are sometimes
unbelievably deluded. This delusion loads us into inappropriate
or bad action. As for hunger, it is always present
desire for pleasure, desire for fame, and so on. If it reaches
the point of being a mental thirst, one becomes a preta.
Why be hungry? We have sufficient intelligence to know
what we have to do so, let's do it contentedly. without preta-like
hunger. Even if we do buy lottery tickets, we don't have
to do it with preta-like hunger. We can buy our tickets
simply for the fun of it, or we can think of how we are
thereby helping provide funds to develop the country. We
don't have to buy tickets out of hunger, as pretas. If there
is awareness, "I" and "mine" do not arise and one is not
hungry, not a preta. But if awareness is lacking one is
hungry, one has become a preta here and now. It is the
same with fear. Fear can become a habit. Think about it.
To be afraid, as some people are, of even earthworms,
lizards, geckoes, and mice is just going too far. This is
unjustified fear. Then there is fear of ghosts, things whose
presence cannot even be demonstrated. And something
some people are very afraid of is Dharma. They are afraid
that practising Dharma will make life tasteless and dry, that
Nirvana is simply tasteless and dry. So they fear Dharma and
Nirvana. Such people are full-fledged asuras, right here and
now.
Now we move up to the realm of human beings. The
term "human being" in this context implies fatigue,
exhaustion, shedding sweat, hard work, trading the sweat
of one's brow for food and sensual pleasure. If has nothing
to do with anxiety, delusion, or the others: it is the honest
exchanging of the sweat of one's brow for things one wants.
This is the meaning of the term "human being". Don't think
of it as of a type with the terms "hell-being", "animal", "preta",
and "asura", which refer to something much lower. "Hell'
means anxiety, "animal" means delusion, "preta" means
hunger, "asura" means fear. "Human being" means
something of a totally different type. It means simply
striving, persevering, working to get things one wants
honesty and fairly, purchasing them with the sweat of one's
brow. This is what it is to be a human being. In short the
meaning of "human being" is faligue, a condition of habitual
fatigue.
Higher than this are the gods of the kamavacara
(sensual) heaven. These are the gods we hear about
who have celestial mansions, attendant angels, and so
on. The reference is to a condition of freedom from fatigue,
and abundance of every sensual pleasure. Higher again is
the state of a person who has become bored with sensual
pleasure, who has come to see sensual pleasure as something
contaminating and wishes to live uncontaminated and
pure. This is the heaven of the embodied brahmas (rupa
brahma), in which there is involvement in material things.
And higher again is the level where one sees the body as
impermanent, not worth becoming involved in, and feels it
would be better to have no body at all. A person who feels
this way is called a bodiless brahma (arupa brahma).
The meanings of these terms are not as in everyday
usage. For example the hell depicted in temple murals,
with great copper cauldrons, seas of acid, rains of lances
and swords, is a metaphor, an illustration in material terms
of mental states that cannot be depicted. It is a physical
illustration of anxiety, and worry ("mind-heat"). Similarly we
have physical representations of delusion, hunger, and
fear. Similarly again the "human realm" is the condition of
fatigue. And the kamavacara heaven is complete sensual
satisfaction; when a person has, by means of money,
power, good luck, or whatever, attained satisfaction in
sensual pleasure, and is free of fatigue, he is a god in the
senusal realm, called kamavacara. And a bodiless brahma
is one who has become tired of this, who has ceased being
involved in sensual pleasure and takes delight only in pure
things, things that do not contaminate.
Let us examine the state of our own minds. Sometimes
we are infatuated with sensual pleasure, but when we repeat
it over and over, we became fed up with it and wish to have
a rest from it. Sometimes we want to play, or interest
ourselves in other material things, and those things fail to
satisfy, and we begin thinking of non-physical things such
as good fortune, name, and fame. Let's put it more simply.
There are people who are infatuated with sensual pleasure
and there are others who prefer to amuse themselves wfith
hobbies, such as gardening or keeping tropical fish or
pigeons, and become infatuated with them. The mind is
liable to change in this way. Now it may happen that a
certain person at a certain time comes to see that all these
things are a source of confusion and not to be compared
with mental things-thoughts and dreams about possible
good fortune, about beauty, or about name and fame, rich-physical
things. These various conditions differ considerably
among themselves; they constitute a series of levels. The
point to note is that a single person is liable to experience
any of these eight kinds of birth. Examine yourselves and
see how many different states the mind can go through. On
a certain day a certain person may be involoved in sensual
pleasure for an hour or so. Then he may feel like having
a break from it by going and playing sport or amusing himself
with some hobby. At other times he may feel like having
a complete rest, free from all disturbance. Sometimes he
has to be a "human being", working for long hours,
becoming fatigued. And sometimes he spends a few minutes
in hell (anxiety); or in the condiltion of an animal (delusion),
or a preta (hunger), or an asura (fear). So a single person
may experience several kinds of birth in a single day; and
in a week he may experience all eight kinds. He may be
born in one of the woeful states (hell, animal, preta, asura),
in the human realm, or in the heavens of gods and brahmas.
But whichever kind of birth it is, it is nothing but suffering;
freedom from suffering comes only with freedom from birth.
This last statement is difficult to understand; but once you
have understood it, you have understood the whole of the
Buddha's teaching.
The expression "freedom from birth" does not imply
that one is not born again after physical death, that after
having died and been placed in the coffin one is not reborn.
Please think about this: if in the daily round there is only
awareness, preventing the arising of "I" and "mine", the "self" -idea,
egoism- that is freedom from birth. When nothing
remains but awareness, one is able to do what one has to
do, and to do it properly. Under these conditions, doing one's
job is fun; to be able to do one's job properly without any
"I" or "mine" is a joy. This is the essence of the Buddha's
teaching. In effect it calls on us to live with a mind free from
the idea "I","mine". Every religion teaches this; it is based
on a law of nature, which can be proved rigorously,
scientifically.
Buddhism teaches that if one's thoughts include the
idea of self, self centredness, that is suffering. Christianity
teaches the same thing; it teaches us not to think in terms
of "I" or "mine", not to misidentity as "I" or "mine". But most
Christians don't understand this teaching, just as most of us.
Buddhists don't understand the Buddha's teaching on this
matter. It's the same the world over and in every religion:
no one understands the real essence of his own religion.
We Buddhists don't understand what is meant by "Don't be
born! Stop being born!" We don't understand it and so we
are perplexed, disbelieving it. or even considering it a false
teaching. Perhaps we do not go so far as to accuse the
Buddha of teaching false doctrine but still that idea is there
in our minds; or we may think that any monk expounding
this doctrine is misrepresenting the Buddha. This is what
happens. So we fail completely to understand the doctrine
of anatta (non-self) and sunnata (emptiness), the doctrine
that there is no "I" or "mine". Consequently we experience
suffering. We are born frequently; we experience more of
Samsara than of Nirvana.
The proof of all this is the fact that the hospitals for
nervous and mental disorders are overfilled. This is all
the proof needed we don't have to ask further. People
simply don't understand the truth about how to prevent
mental illness. This is the objective of the Buddha's teaching.
The Buddha's goal was a life of awareness, continuous
awareness, seeing the world as something empty of "I",
"mine", keeping the mind always free of the idea "I",
"mine", leaving only the awareness, so that one knows what
has to be done, and does it. This is the essence of the
Buddha's teaching: there is no more to it than this.
Now at this point, I should like to say something about
a Christian teaching which Christians themselves take no
interest in. It's a piece in the New Testament, from the book
of Corinthians, in which St Paul sums up the entire teaching
of Jesus. It is a short piece of instrunction to the Corinthian
people : "If you have a wife, think as if you have no wife.
If you have wealth, think as if you have no wealth. If you
are suffering, think as if you were not suffering. If you are
happy, think as if you were not happy. If you go to buy
goods at the market, bring nothing home."
Here we have the essence of the Buddhist teaching
in the Bible: "If you have a wife, think as if you have no
wife." Paul is speaking to the men ; he does not mention
that a woman who has a husband should think as if she
had no husband, but this is understood : the statement is
good for both wife and husband. The meaning is: "Dont
grasp and cling : don't identify as "mine." "If you have wealth,
don't go clinging to it, thinking of it as my wealth ; in effect,
think as if you had no wealth. If suffering arises, then
acknowledge it and it will go away. Don't think of it as
my suffering. If you have happiness, then don't think of it
as my happiness. If you go and buy something at the
market, bring nothing home. This means : while we are
carrying our purchases home from the market, our mind is
not identifying them as "mine". In this sense we are
bringing nothing home. This is a Christian teaching, the
essence of Christianity. I once asked a Christian, a
highranking teacher, how he understood this passage. At
first he was speechless, then he said "I've never taken any
interest in it." He had never taken any interest whatever
in this piece from the Bible because he thought it
unimportant. He had taken great interest in the subject of
faith and so on, but had taken no interest in this, the most
important subject of all. Everv religion worthy of the name
aims essentially at teaching freedom from self-centredness.
Every religion includes the important teaching of freedom
from self and from concern with self in which, however, its
adherents take no interest. They are like us Buddhists, who
take no interest in the doctrine of sunnata and anatta, the
characteristic doctrine of Buddhism.
It can be said, then, that mankind is taking no interest
in the thing that is most important to mankind. People
are interested only in chattering and eating, self-centred
pastimes which increase "I" and "mine". Consequently they
are more often hell-beings, animals, pretas, and asuras
than human beings. And when they are human beings, they
are sweating and striving far too much, not knowing how
to relax. If they are in one of the heavenly realms, they are
experiencing the corresponding kind of suffering as gods,
or brahmas, or whatever. This is because they don t
understand, they have fallen under the influence of Mara
(Satan); they have been drawn into the way of Mara rather
than in to the way of the Buddha.
Mara (Satan) is yet another thing we don't understand
properly. In reality "Mara" denotes all the fascinating things
that draw the mind and subjugate it. Mara is these things,
in particular sexual and other sensual pleasures. Mara's
commander-in-chief entices us into the paranimmitavasavatti
heaven, the heaven that abounds in sensual delights, where
other off-siders of Mara then wait on us, serving us and
attending to our every need. This is what is meant by
"Mara's commander-in-chief.". At present we are underlings
or victims of Mara because we are desiring these things
and are thereby cultivating the "I" and the "mine". Once
"I" and "mine" have arisen, there is no end to it; one has
got into the Mara current rather than the Buddha current.
This is all there is to Mara. Whenever there exists in the
mind the idea "I" , "mine" then Mara is present, one is an
underling of Mara. And whenever the mind is empty of
"I" , "mine" one is a follower of the Buddha. In a single
day you may be an underling of Mara for a few hours and
a follower of the Buddha for a few hours. Everyone realizes
this so there is no need to discuss it here. Everyone can
see for himself that in a single day "I" and "mine" may be
present for a few hours, and absent for a few hours.
At any moment when "I" and "mine" arise, one is born
as this or that, and identifying with it; and that is suffering,
every time. We ought to fight shy of this and take steps
to prevent its arising. We have to foster and prolong those
periods of emptiness and quietness, of Nirvana, and in time
we shall be free of all ailments, both mental and physical.
Diabetes, high blood pressure, heart diseases -all these
come from "I", "mine". Identification as "I" or "mine" is a
source of disturbance which prevents our getting sufficient
rest. When the mind is confused, the sugar metabolism
becomes abnormal, rising and falling sharply, and the result
is some physical illness. Mental illness also results, in the
form of mental suffering. In short, the body can't take the
stress and the result is nervous or mental illness or even
death. Though one may escape death, one is sure to
experience much suffering and melancholy, as if one had
fallen into one of the hells,
This whole question could be treated in much greater
detail. For example, we have spoken of hell as equivalent
to anxiety, though the more detailed texts recognize
eighteen or twenty-eight or more different hell-regions.
Ultimately, however, they all involve suffering from heat;
there is no hell that is cool. With the pretas it is the same.
Several different kinds of pretas are recognized : serpent-pretas,
pretas with mouths the size of a needle's eye and
bellies the size of a mountain (hence never able to satisfy
their hunger) and others. But they all amount to the same
thing: hunger. You can interpret all these details how you
like, at a great or little length as you like, so long as
you, understand the basic meaning : hell-beings suffer
anxiety, animals are deluded, pretas are hungry, asuras are
afraid, human beings are fatigued, kamaval gods are
infatuated with sensual delights, embodied brahmas are
infatuated with pure physical things, and bodiless brahmas
are infatuated with pure mental things. These are all
forms of "birth". Without exception, everyone who is "born"
is certain to suffer. Try to give up this identifying altogether.
"True happiness consists in eliminating the false idea "I "."
Maintain awareness and insight ; be free of "l" and "mine"
and you will be free from suffering. Maintain this condition
; when it has become permanent, that is genuine and
complete Nirvana.
We already have momentary Nirvana. Let us prolong
it, reducing suffering, or Samsara, as far as possible. Let
us not waste this opportunity, this eighty-year or hundred-year
long life into which we have been born. If we don't
effect this improvement we may never get anywhere, even
if we live a thousand years ; but if we do effect this
improvement, we may achieve full Nirvana in this very life.
Whether a person is a child, a teenager, an adult, or an
eighty-year-old, if he properly understands the meaning of
all this, how suffering arises and how it ceases, he will be
able to cure all his ailments effectively, to control self-centredness,
the "I" and the "mine" ; he will automatically
become fed up with it, and begin experiencing coolness,
happiness, freedom from suffering. This is all there is to
it. The Buddha summed it up briefly when he said : Don't
grasp at or cling to anything whatsoever (Sabbe dhamma
nalam abhinivesaya) , that is, don't cling to it as "I" or
"mine". No matter what it is physical object, condition,
action, mental object, result of action, or whatsoever don't
think of it as "I" or "mine". Think of it as belonging to Nature,
as Nature itself, as a part of Nature obeying the laws
of Nature, as the property of Nature. Don't take it as
"I", "mine". Anyone who is so bold as to think of it as
"I", "mine", is a thief, appropriating for himself something
that properly belongs to Nature. No good can come of
thieving, it is bound to lead to the suffering of a thief. Hence
the Buddha's teaching that we shouldn't grasp at or cling
to anything as "I" or "mine". Hence also his statement, so
terse that it is hard to understand and even harder to
accept : "If people will practise right living, this world will not
be empty of Arahants." This statement sums up the whole
teaching.
I hope you will all take an interest in this teaching
of the Buddha, that you will think it over, examine it, and
come to understand it. It is the profound and essential
core of the Dharma, and it is genuinely capable of helping
us attain freedom from suffering.